This site contains promotional information intended only for healthcare professionals resident in the United Kingdom

Visit Pfizer Medical site

Menu

Close

Sign InLog Out
  • EN
Single LinkDropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLinked DropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkMega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
Linked Mega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
EN - EnglishSelect a languageLanguagesEN - EnglishFR - Françias

Menu

Close

Sign InLog Out
  • EN
Single LinkDropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLinked DropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkMega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
Linked Mega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
EN - EnglishSelect a languageLanguagesEN - EnglishFR - Françias
Search

Menu

Close

Sign In or RegisterLog Out
Pfizer MedicinesTherapy AreasExplore ContentEventsVideosMaterialsFeatured ArticlesLet’s ConnectSupplyAlliance HealthcareOff-contract claims

Adverse event reporting can be found at the bottom of the page

Menu

Close

Clinical TrialsClinical TrialsLORVIQUA® Clinical TrialsPhase I/II StudyCROWN StudySafetySafetyLORVIQUA® Safety ProfileDosingDosingLORVIQUA® DosingResourcesResourcesLORVIQUA® ResourcesCase StudiesVideosMaterials

The content of this webpage has been produced in line with the LORVIQUA®▼ (lorlatinib) Summary of Product Characteristics for Great Britain.
If you are an HCP in Northern Ireland click here.

LORVIQUA®▼ (lorlatinib) Prescribing Information for Great Britain and Northern Ireland click here. XALKORI® (crizotinib) Prescribing Information for Great Britain and Northern Ireland click here. Adverse event reporting information can be found at the bottom of the page.

CROWN Study: Efficacy Outcomes

The CROWN study is a global, open-label, randomised, multicentre Phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of LORVIQUA® against crizotinib in treatment-naïve ALK+ advanced NSCLC patients.1,2

The primary endpoint for the CROWN study was progression-free survival (PFS)* assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).1

Secondary endpoints included:2

•    PFS* (investigator-assessed)
•    Objective response rate (by BICR and investigator-assessed)
•    Duration of response (by BICR)
•    Intracranial duration of response (by BICR)
•    Intracranial time to progression (by BICR) 
•    Time to response and intracranial time to response (by BICR)
•    Overall survival 
•    Safety
•    Quality of life
Reported below are primary endpoint and key secondary endpoint data from an interim analysis (data cutoff: March 20, 2020) and updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021).†​‡1, 2​​​​​​The updated analysis was not pre-specified, therefore results are descriptive and exploratory in nature, and formal statistical comparisons between the treatment groups are not available.2​​​​​​Primary Endpoint: PFS* (by BICR; ITT population)

Primary interim analysis (data cutoff: March 20, 2020)

The probability of PFS* at 12 months was 78% (95% CI: 70-84%) for LORVIQUA® (n=149) and 39% (95% CI: 30-48%) for crizotinib (n=147).

Median PFS* was not reached (95% CI: NR-NR) in the LORVIQUA® arm vs.  9.3 months (95% CI: 7.6-11.1 months) in the crizotinib arm.1

LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of progression or death by 72% vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.28 [95% CI: 0.19-0.41]; p<0.001).1

Primary interim analysis (data cutoff: March 20, 2020)*

Adapted from Shaw AT, et al. NEJM. 2020.1
Data cutoff: March 20, 2022.1

Updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)

The probability of PFS* at 36 months was 64% for LORVIQUA® (n=149) and 19% for crizotinib (n=147).

Median PFS* was NR (95% CI: NR-NR) in the LORVIQUA® arm vs. 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.6-11.1 months) in the crizotinib arm.2

LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of progression or death by 73% vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.184-0.388]).2

Adapted from Shaw AT, et al. NEJM. 2020. and Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.1,2
Data cutoff: September 20, 2021.2

Sub-group analysis of PFS (by BICR)*
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)

At 36 months, the HR for PFS* by BICR favoured LORVIQUA® over crizotinib across all prespecified patient subgroups.2,3

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. Supplementary Appendix.3
Data cutoff: September 20,2021.2

PFS* in patients with baseline brain metastases (by BICR)
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)
              Patients (n)                         Events (n)                       mPFS (months)         
LORVIQUA® 37 16 NR (95% CI: 18.2-NR)
Crizotinib 39 27 7.2 (95% CI: 3.7-9.2)
HR (95% CI) 0.21 (0.10-0.44)

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2

At 36 months, LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of progression or death in patients with baseline brain metastases by 79% vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.21 [95% CI: 0.10-0.44]).2 

PFS* in patients without baseline brain metastases (by BICR)
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)
              Patients (n)                         Events (n)                       mPFS (months)         
LORVIQUA® 112 33 NR (95% CI: NR-NR)
Crizotinib 108 65 11.0 (95% CI: 9.0-14.6)
HR (95% CI) 0.29 (0.19-0.44)

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2

At 36 months, LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of progression or death in patients without baseline metastases by 71% vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.19-0.44]).2

Key Secondary Endpoints IC-TTP (by BICR; ITT population)
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)

At 36 months, 92% of patients in the LORVIQUA® arm (n=149) were without IC progression vs. 38% in the crizotinib arm (n=147).

Median IC-TTP was NR (95% CI: NR-NR) in the LORVIQUA® arm vs. 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.1 months-NR) in the crizotinib arm.2  

LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of IC progression by 92% vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.08 [95% CI: 0.040-0.174]).2

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2
Data cutoff: September 20,2021.2

IC-TTP (by BICR; in patients with baseline brain metastases)
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)
              Patients (n)                         Events (n)                       mIC-TTP (months)         
LORVIQUA® 37 8 NR (95% CI: NR-NR)
Crizotinib 39 26 7.3 (95% CI: 3.7-9.3)
HR (95% CI) 0.10 (0.04-0.27)

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2

At 36 months, LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of IC progression in patients with baseline brain metastases by 90% vs. crizotinib (HR 0.10 [95% CI: 0.04-0.27]).2

IC-TTP (by BICR; in patients without baseline brain metastases)
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)
              Patients (n)                         Events (n)                       mIC-TTP (months)         
LORVIQUA® 112 1 NR (95% CI: NR-NR)
Crizotinib 108 25 30.8 (95% CI: 18.4-NR)
HR (95% CI) 0.02 (0.002-0.14)

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2

At 36 months, LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of IC progression in patients without baseline brain metastases by 98% vs. crizotinib (HR 0.02 [95% CI: 0.002-0.14]).2

ORR and IC-ORR (by BICR; ITT population) 
From an updated analysis (data cutoff: September 20, 2021)

At 36 months, ORR was achieved in 77% of patients treated with LORVIQUA® (n=149) vs. 59%  with crizotinib (n=147). Patients in the LORVIQUA® arm were more than two times more likely to have an ORR compared to patients in the crizotinib arm (OR: 2.37 [95% CI: 1.41-4.10]). 3% of patients in the LORVIQUA® arm achieved complete response vs. 0% in the crizotinib arm.2  

In patients with ≥1 measurable brain metastases at baseline, 83% achieved IC-ORR with LORVIQUA® (n=18) vs. 23% with crizotinib (n=13). Patients in the LORVIQUA® arm were more than 17 times more likely to have a IC-ORR compared to patients in the crizotinib arm (OR: 17.74 [95% CI: 2.07-173.00). 72% of patients in the LORVIQUA® arm achieved a complete response vs. 8% in the crizotinib arm.2

  LORVIQUA® Crizotinib
ITT population, n 149 147
Confirmed ORR by BICR, n(%) 115 (77) 86 (59)
Complete response 4 (3) 0
Median DOR (95% CI), months NR (NR-NR) 9.6 (9.0-12.9)
Patients with measurable and non-measurable baseline brain metastases, n 37 39
Confirmed IC ORR by BICR, n(%) 24 (65) 7 (18)
Complete IC response 22 (59) 5 (13)
Median IC-DOR (95% CI), months NR (NR-NR) 9.4 (6.0-11.1)
Patients with measurable baseline brain metastases, n 18 13
Confirmed IC ORR by BIRC, n(%) 15 (83) 3 (23)
Complete IC response 13 (72) 1 (8)
Median IC-DOR (95% CI), months NR (NR-NR) 10.2 (9.4-11.1)

Adapted from Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022.2

OS (ITT population) 
From the interim analysis (data cutoff: March 20, 2020)

OS was hierarchically tested for significance at the time of the interim analysis of PFS, as the primary endpoint was statistically significantly in favour of the LORVIQUA® arm.

At the time of data cutoff for the interim analysis, OS data were still evolving, with deaths occurring in 15% of patients in the LORVIQUA® arm (n=149) vs. 19% in the crizotinib arm (n=147). LORVIQUA® reduced the risk of death vs. crizotinib by 28% (HR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.41-1.25]), though the between-group difference in OS was not significant.1

*Defined as the time from randomisation to RECIST-defined disease progression or death from any cause.1
†At the time of the interim analysis the median follow-up for PFS was 18.3 months in the LORVIQUA arm and 14.8 months in the crizotinib arm.1
‡At the time of the updated analysis, the median duration of treatment was 33.3 months (IQR: 13.9-39.8) with LORVIQUA® and 9.6 months (IQR: 4.7-17.1) with crizotinib. Median duration of follow-up for PFS was 36.7 months (IQR: 31.3-41.9) with LORVIQUA® and 29.3 months (IQR: 10.8-35.0) with crizotinib.2

Quality of Life

Outcomes for the secondary endpoint of patient-reported quality of life.

Learn moreLoading
Safety Outcomes

Safety profile of LORVIQUA® in the CROWN Study.

Learn moreLoading

ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase, BICR: Blinded Independent Central Review, CI: confidence interval, DoR: duration of response, ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, HR: hazard ratio, IA: investigator-assessed, IC: intracranial, ITT: intention-to-treat, NR: not reached, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, ORR: objective response rate, OS: overall survival, PFS: progression-free survival, QoL: quality of life, RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, TTP: time to progression, TTR: time to response.

References:

Shaw AT, et al. NEJM 2020;383:2018-29.Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4 [Accessed January 2023].Solomon BJ, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. Supplementary Appendix. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4 [Accessed January 2023].
PP-LOR-GBR-0271. January 2023

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search 

for MHRA Yellow Card in Google Play or Apple App Store

 

Adverse events should also be reported to Pfizer Medical Information on 01304 616161

PfizerPro Account

To access further materials, resources and receive communication about medicines and vaccines promoted by Pfizer.

Sign In or RegisterAccountSign Out

This site is intended only for healthcare professionals resident in the United Kingdom. If you are a member of the public wishing to access information on a specific medicine, please visit www.medicines.org.uk/emc

 

This website is brought to you by Pfizer Limited, a company registered in England 

and Wales under No. 526209 with its registered office at Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9NJ

 

Copyright © 2024 Pfizer Limited. All rights reserved.

 

VAT registration number GB201048427

PP-UNP-GBR-7866. January 2024
For UK Healthcare Professionals*

These pages are not intended for patients or for members of the general public. The healthcare professional web pages contain promotional content.

I confirm that I am a healthcare professional* resident in the United Kingdom.

If you select 'No', you will be redirected to Pfizer.co.uk where you will be able to access reference information on Pfizer's prescription medicines.

*The ABPI Code definition for healthcare professional is members of the medical, dental, pharmacy and nursing professionals and any other persons who in the course of their professional activities may administer, prescribe, purchase, recommend or supply a medicine.

PP-UNP-GBR-7812. January 2024

YesNo
You are now leaving PfizerPro​​​​​

​​​​​​​You are now leaving www.pfizerpro.co.uk. Links to external websites are provided as a resource to the viewer. This website is neither owned or controlled by Pfizer Ltd. 

Pfizer accepts no responsibility for the content or services of the linked site.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

​​​​​​​PP-PFE-GBR-3858. November 2021​​​​​​​
​​​​​​​
You are now leaving PfizerPro
​​​​​​​
​​​​​​​You are now leaving www.pfizerpro.co.uk. Links to external websites are provided as a resource to the viewer. This website is neither owned nor controlled by Pfizer Ltd. 

Pfizer accepts no responsibility for the content or services of the linked site other than the information or other materials relating to ​​​​​Pfizer medicines or 
business which it has provided or reviewed.

PP-PFE-GBR-3859. November 2021
​​​​​​​