This site contains promotional information intended only for healthcare professionals resident in the United Kingdom

Menu

Close

Sign InLog Out
  • EN
Single LinkDropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLinked DropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkMega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
Linked Mega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
EN - EnglishSelect a languageLanguagesEN - EnglishFR - Françias

Menu

Close

Sign InLog Out
  • EN
Single LinkDropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLinked DropdownLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkMega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
Linked Mega MenuHeading

Example of description text sitting alongside header

LabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLinkLabelLinkLinkLinkLink
EN - EnglishSelect a languageLanguagesEN - EnglishFR - Françias
Search

Menu

Close

Sign In or RegisterLog Out
Pfizer MedicinesTherapy AreasExplore ContentEventsVideosMaterialsFeatured ArticlesLet’s ConnectSupplyAlliance HealthcareOff-contract claims

Adverse event reporting can be found at the bottom of the page

Menu

Close

Maternal Vaccination
Adults
Preparation
Real World Data
Private Market
Useful Resources
Useful
Resources
VideosMaterials

ABRYSVO®▼(Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine [bivalent, recombinant]) Prescribing Information for the United Kingdom click here.  

UK Real-World Data with ABRYSVOABRYSVO is indicated for:1
  • Active immunisation for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in individuals 60 years of age and older.
  • Active immunisation for the prevention of LRTD caused by RSV in individuals 18 through 59 years of age who are at increased risk for LRTD caused by RSV.
The use of this vaccine should be in accordance with official recommendations.1

Since the introduction of RSV immunisation programmes in the UK, published real-world evidence has evaluated ABRYSVO across both adult and maternal vaccination settings.

The studies below include UK data from older adults hospitalised with RSV-associated respiratory illness, UK-wide evidence across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and infant hospitalisation outcomes following maternal vaccination.2-8

Older Adult VaccinationHARISS Study (Symes et al., 2025)2A multicentre test-negative case-control study conducted across 14 NHS hospitals in England found ABRYSVO was associated with 82.3% vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated ARI hospitalisation in adults aged 75-79 years.View Study Details2Study MethodologyEstimates effectiveness of ABRYSVO against RSV-related ARI hospitalisations among adults aged 75-79 in England during the 2024-2025 RSV season (October 1st 2024 - March 31st 2025).

Adjusted vaccine effectiveness results for the 2024-2025 season

When ABRYSVO was administered at least 14 days before hospital presentation:

 Adjusted VEConfidential Interval (CI)Cases (Vaccinated)Controls (Vaccinated)
Overall82.3%(95% CI 70.6-90.0)16/173308/833
Adults with severe disease†86.7%(95% CI 75.4-93.6)10/138211/573
Immunocompetent adults86.2%(95% CI 73.6-93.6)9/126218/609
Immunosupressed adults72.8%(95% CI 39.5-89.3)7/4790/224
Adults admitted with lower respiratory tract infections(LRTIs)88.6%(95% CI 75.6-95.6)6/103200/561
Adults admitted for exacerabation of lung disease‡77.4%(95% CI 42.4-92.8)5/4181/210
Adults admitted for exacerbation of lung disease, heart disease or frailty‡78.8%(95% CI 47.8-93.0)5/4588/230
Chronic heart and vascular disease77.0%(95% CI 59.1-88.0)13/110189/506
Chronic respiratory disease80.1%(95% CI 62.4-90.6)10/93194/508
†Severe disease includes requirement of oxygen supplementation; high-flow nasal oxygen; noninvasive ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure; invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation; and admission to the intensive care unit on hospital admission and adults who died within 30 days of hospital admission. ‡ No LRTI.

Key takeaway

ABRYSVO was associated with protection against RSV-associated hospitalisation in adults aged 75-79 years in England.²

Study limitations

  • The study was conducted during a single season
  • The study sample was not large enough to assess VE against more severe outcomes alone such as intensive care admission
  • Testing procedures may have varied across sites. RSV subtyping data (RSV-A and RSV-B) was not reported
  • Because the controls selected for this study were negative for RSV, influenza and SARS-CoV-2, it was not possible to perform a sensitivity analysis using controls who were RSV-negative but positive for influenza and/or SARs-CoV-2
  • Despite assessing relevant confounders and adjusting for them when appropriate, residual confounding may still influence results
ARI: acute respiratory infection. CI: confidence interval. RSV: respiratory syncytial virus, VE: vaccine effectiveness
England: National impact analysis of RSV vaccination programme (Mensah et al., 2025)3A national analysis of RSV-associated hospitalisations in England which found a 30% reduction in hospital admissions among vaccine-eligible older adults following introduction of the RSV vaccination programme.View Study Details3Study MethodologyThis national population-level analysis evaluated the early impact of the RSV vaccination programme in England. RSV-associated hospital admissions among adults aged 70–84 years registered with a general practitioner in England were analysed before and after programme implementation using statistical modelling adjusted for vaccine eligibility and population size.

Key Findings

Estimated 30% reduction
Reduction in RSV-associated hospitalisations observed following introduction of the RSV vaccination programme in England.
72% estimated vaccine effectiveness
Observed reductions in hospitalisations were consistent with an estimated vaccine effectiveness of approximately 72%

Key takeaway

Introduction of the RSV vaccination programme was associated with a reduction in RSV-related hospitalisations among vaccine-eligible older adults in England during the first programme season.

Study limitations

  • The analysis evaluated the early impact of the programme during the first RSV season following implementation.
  • As an observational study, causality cannot be definitively established.
  • Other factors, including seasonal variation in RSV circulation, may have influenced hospitalisation rates.
  • Findings were derived from population-level modelling and should be interpreted within the context of the study methodology.
 Scotland: National impact analysis of RSV vaccination programme4 (Hameed et al, 2025)A population-level analysis in Scotland which found a 62.1% reduction in RSV-associated hospitalisations among vaccine-eligible older adults following introduction of the RSV vaccination programme.View Study Details4Study MethodologyThis population-level analysis evaluated the early impact of the RSV vaccination programme in Scotland. RSV-associated hospital admissions among adults aged 70-84 years were assessed using a regression discontinuity design, comparing vaccine-eligible adults aged 75-79 years with neighbouring age groups that were not eligible for vaccination during the same period.

Key Findings

Estimated 62.1% reduction in RSV-associated hospitalisations
A 62.1% reduction in RSV-associated hospital admissions was observed following introduction of the RSV vaccination programme in Scotland
Estimated vaccine effectiveness of 85.7%
Observed reductions in hospitalisations were consistent with an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 85.7%

Key Takeaway

Introduction of the RSV vaccination programme was associated with fewer RSV-related hospital admissions among vaccine-eligible older adults in Scotland during the first programme season

Study Limitations

  • The analysis evaluated the early impact of the programme during the first RSV season following implementation
  • Sample sizes within individual age groups were relatively small
  • As an observational population-level study, causality cannot be definitively established
  • Findings were based on aggregated data and statistical modelling and should be interpreted within the context of the study methodology
4-Nation Meta-analysis (Bucholc etc al., 2026)5A UK-wide analysis of 11,117 adults aged 74-79 years across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland estimated 75% vaccine effectiveness against RSV-related hospitalisation. The RSV vaccination programme was estimated to avert approximately 643 RSV-related hospital admissions during the 2024-25 season.View Study Details5Study MethodologyThe study evaluated the effectiveness of ABRYSVO against RSV-related hospitalisation among adults aged 74-79 years during the first UK RSV vaccination programme season (30th September 2024 to 30th March 2025). National surveillance, vaccination and hospital admissions datasets from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were linked at an individual patient level.

Adjusted vaccine effectiveness results

NationAdjusted VE (%)
England74
Northern Ireland77
Scotland81
Wales82
Pooled UK estimate               75                                                   

Key findings 

75%
Pooled VE against RSV-related hospitalisations
11,117
Adults aged 74-79 years included across the UK
643
Hospital admissions estimated to have been averted

Key takeaways

  • Real-world evidence from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland estimated 75% vaccine effectiveness against RSV-related hospitalisation in adults aged 74–79 years.
  • The RSV vaccination programme was estimated to avert approximately 643 RSV-related hospital admissions across the UK during the first programme season.

Study limitations

  • The study was conducted during a single season.
  • The study sample was not large enough to assess VE against more severe outcomes alone such as intensive care admission.
  • Testing procedures may have varied across sites. RSV subtyping data (RSV-A and RSV-B) was not reported.
  • Because the controls selected for this study were negative for RSV, influenza and SARS-CoV-2, it was not possible to perform a sensitivity analysis using controls who were RSV-negative but positive for influenza and/or SARs-CoV-2.
  • Despite assessing relevant confounders and adjusting for them when appropriate, residual confounding may still influence resultsRSV: respiratory syncytial virus. SARs-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. VE: vaccine effectiveness.
Maternal VaccinationBronchstop 2024 - 2025 (Williams et al, 2025)6A national programme of bivalent prefusion F vaccination in pregnancy and protection against respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation in infants until age 6 months in the UK: a multicentre, prospective, test-negative, case–control study.View Study Details6

 Study methodologyStudy MethodologyThis multicentre, test-negative, case-control study evaluated the effectiveness of maternal RSV vaccination with ABRYSVO administered at ≥28 weeks' gestation against RSV-associated hospitalisation with acute lower respiratory illness (ALRI) in infants aged under 6 months during the 2024–2025 RSV season in the UK. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by comparing maternal vaccination status between RSV-positive and RSV-negative infants hospitalised with ALRI.

Results from the 2024-2025 season

Study limitations

  • Limited vaccine coverage (~30%) in period of study.​
    • Results don’t reflect full season. RSV-positive infants were younger vs. RSV-negative group. Low initial uptake may reduce precision of effectiveness estimates.​
  • Study population 81% White; aligns with UK demographics but limits ethnic diversity.​
  • Dynamic uptake and unequal case-control ratio (391 vs 146) may impact power; accounted for in sample size.​
  • Powered only for primary objective (VE vs RSV hospitalisation with ALRI); severe outcome analyses are exploratory.​ ​

ALRI: acute lower respiratory illness. RSV: respiratory syncytial virus.
Bronchstop 2025 - 2026 (O'Hagen et al, 2026)7A national programme of bivalent prefusion F vaccination in pregnancy and protection against respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation in infants until age 6 months in the UK: a multicentre, prospective, test- negative, case–control studyView Study Details7Study MethodologyThis multicentre, prospective, test-negative, case-control study evaluated the effectiveness of maternal RSV vaccination against RSV-associated hospitalisation in infants up to 6 months of age across the United Kingdom during the 2025–2026 RSV season.

Key Findings

Protection against RSV hospitalisationMaternal RSV vaccination was associated with protection against RSV-associated hospitalisation in infants up to 6 months of age.National programme evidenceThe study evaluated outcomes following implementation of the UK maternal RSV vaccination programme.

Key Takeaway

National programme data demonstrated continued protection against RSV-associated hospitalisation in infants up to 6 months of age following maternal RSV vaccination.

Study Limitations

  • The study was conducted during a single RSV season
  • Findings represent programme experience during an early phase of implementation
  • As an observational study, causality cannot be definitively established
  • Findings should be interpreted within the context of the study design and population assessed
Scotland Population level study (McLachlan et al, 2025)8Effectiveness of the maternal RSVpreF vaccine against severe disease in infants in Scotland, UK: a national, population-based case-control study and cohort analysis.View Study Details8Study MethodologyEstimate the vaccine effectiveness of ABRYSVO when administered during pregnancy against RSV-related LRTI hospital admissions in infants ≤ 3 months ( ≤ 90 days) of age.†

Results from the 2024-2025 season

The adjusted effectiveness of ABRYSVO in preventing hospitalisation among infants of mothers vaccinated > 14 days before delivery was
82.2% (95% CI, 75.1-87.3; p<0.0001)
43 (12·1%) cases and 1518 (43·2%) controls.
The adjusted effectiveness of ABRYSVO in preventing hospitalisation among infants of mothers vaccinated suboptimally (≤14 days before delivery) was
31.7% (95% CI, -15.2-59.5; p=0.2)
18 (5·1%) cases and 205 (5·8%) controls.

Study limitations

  • The study was conducted during a single season, precluding analysis of duration of protection beyond 90 days and potential variation in VE across different seasons.
  • The study was unable to determine which infants might have also received a monoclonal antibody. However, the numbers of doses given were expected to be small and restricted specifically to preterm or at-risk infants. Therefore, it is unlikely to have materially influenced overall VE estimates.
  • A larger sample size is required to allow analysis of RSV-related hospitalisations by severity, such as ICU admissions.
  • Estimates of averted hospitalisations did not account for wider population-level transmission dynamics following introduction of the vaccine programme.
Within this population, cases were defined as infants aged 90 days or younger with an RSV-related hospital admission for (LRTI; first event only) and an RSV-positive PCR test within 14 days before or 2 days after hospital admission.CI: confidence interval. ICU: intensive care unit. LRTI: lower respiratory tract infections. VE: vaccine effectiveness.

This content is for the United Kingdom only. Please refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for more information. 

ABRYSVO Maternal Vaccination Home PageLoadingABRYSVO Private Market Home PageLoadingABRYSVO Useful ResourcesLoading
  • Stay up to date on ABRYSVO

  • Keep up to date with updates, events and key information. 
  • Sign upLoading
ABRYSVO (Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine [bivalent, recombinant]) Summary of Product Characteristics for the United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/15309.Symes R, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00546-8.Mensah A. Early impact of RSV vaccination in older adults in England. Lancet. Published online 24 March 2025. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00346-0.Hameed S, et al. Early evidence of RSV vaccination impact on hospitalisation rates of older people in Scotland. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00064-7.Bucholc M, et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2026;64:101620.Williams TC, Marlow R, Cunningham S, et al. Bivalent prefusion F vaccination in pregnancy and respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation in infants in the UK: results of a multicentre, test-negative, case-control study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2025;9(9):655-662.O'Hagan S, et al. A national programme of bivalent prefusion F vaccination in pregnancy and protection against respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation in infants until age 6 months in the UK: a multicentre, prospective, test-negative, case-control study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2026; doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00134-3.McLachlan I, et al. Effectiveness of the maternal RSVpreF vaccine against severe disease in infants in Scotland, UK: a national, population-based case-control study and cohort analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025.
PP-A1G-GBR-0668. August 2026

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk or search 

for MHRA Yellow Card in Google Play or Apple App Store

 

Adverse events should also be reported to Pfizer Medical Information on 01304 616161

PfizerPro Account

To access further materials, resources and receive communication about medicines and vaccines promoted by Pfizer.

Sign In or RegisterAccountSign Out

This site is intended only for healthcare professionals resident in the United Kingdom. If you are a member of the public wishing to access information on a specific medicine, please visit www.medicines.org.uk/emc

 

This website is brought to you by Pfizer Limited, a company registered in England 

and Wales under No. 526209 with its registered office at Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9NJ

 

Copyright © 2026 Pfizer Limited. All rights reserved.

 

VAT registration number GB201048427

PP-UNP-GBR-13934. January 2026
For UK Healthcare Professionals*

These pages are not intended for patients or for members of the general public. The healthcare professional web pages contain promotional content.

I confirm that I am a healthcare professional* resident in the United Kingdom.

If you select 'No', you will be redirected to Pfizer.co.uk where you will be able to access reference information on Pfizer's prescription medicines.

*The ABPI Code definition for healthcare professional is members of the medical, dental, pharmacy and nursing professionals and any other persons who in the course of their professional activities may administer, prescribe, purchase, recommend or supply a medicine.

PP-UNP-GBR-13971. December 2025

YesNo
You are now leaving PfizerPro​​​​​
​
You are now leaving www.pfizerpro.co.uk. Links to external websites are provided as a resource to the viewer. This website is neither owned nor controlled by Pfizer Ltd. 

Pfizer accepts no responsibility for the content or services of the linked site.

PP-UNP-GBR-12070. April 2025​​​​​​​
​​​​​​​
You are now leaving PfizerPro

​​​​​​​You are now leaving www.pfizerpro.co.uk. Links to external websites are provided as a resource to the viewer. This website is neither owned nor controlled by Pfizer Ltd. 

Pfizer accepts no responsibility for the content or services of the linked site other than the information or other materials relating to ​​​​​Pfizer's medicines or business which it has provided or reviewed.

PP-UNP-GBR-12107. April 2025
​​​​​​​